Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chickbusters

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 April 5.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 02:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Chickbusters

The article was listed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blondetourage, but due to someone removing the AFD tag, the article was not deleted. I am re-listing here, and reposting the votes garnered at the previous deletion discussion. Feedback ^☎ 04:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete- Without the minor weekly matches, I see a no notable tag team without feuds HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notable. --2.136.171.116 (talk) 23:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Never did anything notable as a team. The first two [The Blondetourage and The Chickbusters] were never even officially tag teams unless I missed something. STATic message me! 03:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- This one on the other hand might be salvagable. However it's a bit of a shoot because it's based on the real life friendship between the two, and that's hard to source. I'll abstain on it for that reason. BerleT (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is a friendship notable enough to be the basis of an article? I'm pretty sure many friendships are formed backstage in all of wrestling, we can't have articles for each one. Feedback ^☎ 21:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- not enough notability to be a separate article, I bet the info is already in the main articles and this is totally redundant. MPJ -US 13:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- Really? 1st of all, when you are in a offical tag team you put the info in not only the individuals page, but the team page as well. 2nd of all,they are notable they are feuding right now! Did you not see this weeks RAW? By DJ8946 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ8946 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And feuding is the opposite of teaming, so what is your point? Individually they are notable, no doubt, but their limited work as a team was so minor. MPJ -US 11:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you're telling me that you don't think they will ever be an offical tag team again? There is no doubt they will. There is no doubt they will have a storied history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ8946 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is what we call crystal-balling. Feedback ^☎ 01:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So what has to occur for this to be a notable page? — Preceding unsigned DJ8946 (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC) comment added by DJ8946 (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 02:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC) [reply]

To be notable as a tag team: duration (no a tag team about 2 months), matches (no weekly matches in weekly shows, notable matches) feuds or storylines

(the team didn't have any notable storyline or feud) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well they did have 2 feuds, 1 was with Alicia Fox, Tamina, & Rosa with Natalya. Then after Natalya turned heel they had a feud with the Divas of Doom. & Right now they have a notable feud with each other. & They were an team for a year not including their time in FCW. --DJ8946 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fisrt feud was a minor feud, based in weekly matches. Second had a few matches in weekly shows. No big feuds, like Team 3D vs Beer Money or Edge & Christian vs The Hardys.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.